![]() ![]() "Check your privilege!").Ī regressive is fine with segregated spaces, but only for those higher on the regressive stack (such as black-only college dorms) anyone lower must 100% not have any space only for their group.Ī progressive might respect culture but understands it can be fluid and not everyone celebrates all aspects of cultures the same (especially in melting pots such as the US). ![]() A regressive uses "privilege" to shame and guilt, much like bad religious institutions (i.e. Other people would like to feel that way too."). "You (male/female) never have to think about which bathroom you have to go into. There is typically very little middle ground in their mind.Ī progressive uses "privilege" to make people think about their position (i.e. You are either 100% with their cause, or you are 100% against. Ivanka trump elon musk red pill skin#A regressive believes that things like skin color and sexuality are more important than values or content of character.Ī regressive will place those higher on the regressive stack on pedestals you cannot joke or criticize these people, but you can joke, criticize, or wish death upon those lower on the regressive stack.Ī regressive thinks in black-and-white terms with little nuance. A regressive wants to mainly focus on those ranked higher on the "regressive stack" (based on things like skin color and sexuality) if something is detrimental to someone lower on the regressive stack, but it benefits someone higher on the regressive stack, then it's okay ("the ends justifies the means").Ī progressive tries their best to be "color blind" (as in, all people should be treated the same, everyone should have the same opportunities). I wrote the following and it should give you a good idea of what social justice should be and more what it's become today.Ī progressive wants to improve life for all, usually with a focus based on class. One of the overarching aspects of social justice that I've seen is the adherence to identity politics. But that kind of bias is increasingly typical in elite media reporting, and no longer seen as being something to avoid. government as the villain (with the explicit assumption that it's Trump's fault). It's clearly biased and invested in wanting the migrants to come off as the victims, and the U.S. Where what we have is someone (the mother) with some serious issues in judgement and wider societal problems at work. Whereas in reality a news article would explore why the mother put her son on a raft with strangers in the first place, and not try to create a victim. It begins by pulling on the reader's emotional heart-strings describing the last time a mother saw her son as she put him a on a raft crossing the Rio Grande. government is somehow doing wrong to these children by returning them home. The narrative arc of the article is that the U.S. The title is "10 Years Old, Tearful and Confused After a Sudden Deportation." border being deported back to their country of origin. Just to day I was reading a news piece in the NY Times about children crossing the U.S. Good journalists should have opinions, they just have to keep them to themselves, and make sure they're not introduced in their reporting. >I'd distrust anyone who was so vapid that they didn't form some kind of opinion. Wachowski then pithily responded, "Fuck both of you," before following up with a tweet supporting the Brave Space Alliance, which describes itself as "the first Black and trans led LGBTQIA center located on the South Side of Chicago." Musk, the South African-born entrepreneur who is CEO of SpaceX and Tesla, posted his original tweet with no other comment, but it is thought to refer to his clash with authorities in California over his plans to reopen the Tesla factory in Fremont, in which he was supported by Donald Trump. After Musk tweeted "Take the red pill" - referring to a key scene in The Matrix, which subsequently gave rise to the phrase "redpilling" as an alt-right, misogynist meme, along with a red rose emoji normally associated with the Democratic Socialists of America, the party to which Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rashida Tlaib belong - Trump replied: "Taken!" Andrew Pulver writes via The Guardian: Film-maker Lilly Wachowski has responded to Elon Musk and Ivanka Trump after the pair bantered on social media using a phrase from the Wachowskis' hit 1999 film, The Matrix. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |